A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning potential neighbours more than the construction of the wall in a coastal website in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of organizing breaches, environmental worries, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier plus the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to create their household residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, where by enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of recognized citizens. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment with a Particular Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, significantly inside a sensitive coastal ecosystem for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially developed, is in the right posture. Their legal group has characterised the motion as an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-large water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image which includes considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Moments noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water in the course of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the location became Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately via the national press. René Collier Paul Feely accountant Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important second while in the lawful timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has been called meticulous in his examination of organizing files, maps, and situations connected into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally pressured that their action is enthusiastic by issue for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject claims that the case is about preserving a private see, insisting rather that it is about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they have got described their very long-standing connection to the area and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a couple simply just wanting to establish a household dwelling in accordance Together with the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Particular Place of Conservation and say that every one operates have been carried out determined by professional assistance and authorised designs. Their lawyers have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like coming into the sea through a storm, never alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in community advocacy on arranging and environmental difficulties, although not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from extremely distinctive Specialist backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an too much approach.
Because the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket will have to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and organizing situations. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Stay together with one another long once the authorized fees have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction is effective at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that deal with. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental security and home legal rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it is going to in the long run be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.